Futurist Reynolds returns to TTMA Convention and pronounces that he is more positive today than I've been in 18 months
Jul 1, 2009 12:00 PM, By Rick Weber
“On top of that $6 trillion, there are $6 trillion in money-market funds sitting out there, earning essentially nothing. That was fine three months ago, because then you're whole attitude was, ‘I don't care about a return on capital. I just want a return of capital.’ But now you're sitting there with $6 trillion earning nothing for six months, and you're thinking, ‘It'd be nice to earn something on it. Maybe I need to start investing again.’ I've got $6 trillion of government stimulus and $6 trillion worth of money-market stimulus here. Combine it and you've got $12 trillion worth of stimulus. Ladies and gentlemen, that's called recovery.”
Reynolds said that although he didn't vote for President Obama, he is “in awe” of him because he's a “tremendously powerful figure and incredibly well-spoken” and has chosen a “very good economic team.”
But then he launched into an attack of President Obama's ideology.
“Now there is all this talk that we elected this liberal president,” he said. “I wish we would quit calling President Obama a liberal and call him what he really is: a socialist.”
There was a smattering of applause, which prompted Reynolds to note that he got a standing ovation from the Texas Cattle Ranchers Association for saying the same thing.
“The problem I see with this president and this country is that we are truly in a generational turning point,” he said “We are in the 21st century and we elected a 21st-century president. And he has 21st-century problems. And between nationalizing banks and buying an automobile company and getting ready to socialize medicine, we have reached a tipping point between a capitalist country and a socialist country. The polls tell us that 57% describe themselves as capitalists, 20% as socialists, and the rest don't know.
“We've sort of developed a mentality. Some would call it a populist mentality, but we will call it simply, ‘Get the rich,’ or ‘Punish the rich.’ The problem is, their definition of rich is any family unit in this country that makes more than $100,000 a year. And if you make more than $250,000, you definitely are going to be penalized.
“His health-care plan says that if you are uninsurable or have no insurance, you can get cheap government insurance. And that way, everybody in the country will have insurance. Hospitals looked around and said, ‘This ain't bad, because we have a lot of indigent health care.’ Companies said, ‘This ain't bad, because we're spending a lot of money on health-care benefits for our employees.’ Some of you running your own companies said, ‘Well, if government takes it over, I don't have to pay their health-care benefits.’ If you're in private insurance, how do you compete with that? At some point, all private insurers will be squeezed out, except the handful that caters to the truly rich.
“There's a correlation between his health-care plan and the ‘cap and trade.’ That says that we are going to limit your carbon emissions, and if you want more, you have to buy someone else's right to carbon emissions. In effect, it becomes a carbon tax. The president's health care is going to need $750 billion this year. ‘Cap and trade’ is a tax on energy, it's a tax on the utility companies, and that will be passed on to consumers. ‘Cap and trade’ will generate $750 billion. I submit to you that the chances of the president getting his health-care plan approved are a lot better if he gets ‘cap and trade’ approved.”
© 2013 Penton Media Inc.